The process of removing a Parliamentary Commissioner in Uganda is governed by the Administration of Parliament Act and the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament of Uganda. Here’s how it unfolds:
Grounds for Removal: A Commissioner can be removed for various reasons such as incompetence, misconduct, or inability to perform duties. These grounds are specified in the Administration of Parliament Act and Rule 110.
Initiating the Motion: It begins with a written notice to the Clerk of Parliament, signed by at least one-third of all voting members of Parliament.
Notice and Particulars: The notice must state the grounds for the motion and provide supporting particulars, ensuring well-documented reasons for removal.
Notification to Parliament: The Clerk notifies Parliament within three days by posting the notice and supporting details.
Irrevocable Signatures: Once signed, the motion cannot be withdrawn, ensuring commitment from supporting members.
Placement on Order Paper: The motion is scheduled for debate on the Order Paper after fourteen days, allowing time for preparation.
Rights of the Commissioner: The Commissioner has the right to defend themselves, receive legal representation, and appear in person.
Precedence in Debate: Removal motion takes priority in debates, ensuring sufficient attention.
Additional Evidence: Members can present additional evidence during the debate for a comprehensive discussion.
Speaker’s Role: The Speaker manages the debate process, inviting the Commissioner to address issues raised.
Voting for Removal: Removal requires a vote of at least half of all voting Members of Parliament, ensuring a significant majority decision.
By following this process, the Parliament ensures transparency, accountability, and fair consideration in the removal of a Parliamentary Commissioner.
In a letter dated March 15, 3024, the acting National Unity Platform (NUP) president, Dr. Lina Zedriga Waru, announced the NEC’s decision to recall Mathias Mpuuga from the Parliamentary Commission due to accusations of corruption and abuse of office.
Mpuuga has been accused of receiving a “good service award” of Shs500 million from Parliament, leading to allegations of corruption and abuse of office.
